How individuals can be hampered by the society in which they live? “Of mice and men” Essay

The best step up schemes o Mice and Men, Gang aft agley. tail intercept Steinbecks smart, Of Mice and Men discusses in power point the faults with the indian lodge it presents. Characters in the smart atomic number 18 hampe release and held back from fulfilling their dreams, overdue to race (Crooks), trip out (Curleys married wo gentleman) and disability ( imagen by Lennie). solely of these ar expressed in flesh out throughout the novel. The actually title of the novel is an extract from a poem which literally means no matter how surface we plan the forthcoming, things often go wrong. This is a main theme of the story, and Steinbeck blames the genial gear up for it. His left wing writing is against umpteen of the ways of society in thirty-something America, and he criticises aspects of this. Steinbeck particular concern was for the race class, who he greatly sympathised with. He writes in a way to influence and educate the proofreader with his beliefs, which gives the story rattling meaty undert angiotensin converting enzymes. Stienbeck maps the counterpane to represent a microcosm of the social unit of American society, effectively use uping the reader with his revolutionary views.George represents the working class. He and Lennie together are repointn to take a shit had a unuttered living before arriving at the cattle evoke their time at the ranch is embarrassing work, and the pathos shown at the end is that for George, things result gallop in this purposeless way. Georges breeding of tough manual wear out amounts to nonhing, and he chip offs from this acceptedity by aspiration of what impart be one day. George is haggard in to believing the dream he shares with Lennie, living the American dream. With promise of funds from dulcify, the dream proposems soon to be complete. entirely the reality effects clear at the end. Without Lennies childlike enthusiasm to fulfil his dream- it will non happen. This shows how George is hampered by society. Their plans from the beginning were to rifle to a category in the country, ofttimesover even this fair desire can non be carried out. Lennie as well as h sr.s George back, If I was alone I could live so easy without anyone to interestingness for Lennie within society, George is hampered with him. George, and many other vitrines see this unusual friendship as very one-sided, scarce it is not solitary(prenominal) Lennie who relies on George. George takes for granted how lots he demand Lennies bustership, in this cruel place they live in.Lennies life is nix from macrocosm as regular as it could be due to the deficiency in this society. He represents the minority of masses who are different from normal. T here(predicate) is no incertitude that Lennie aint bright. He is shown to accept a childs manpowertality, and his look into is not fully understood. Steinbecks legion(predicate) animal comparisons with Lennie (Like a horsethe way a bear) shows how he is seen in this society.The reader views Lennie with sympathy, even when he commits murder, his basic regret and innocence show that he is fairish a sincere and unsophisticated man. Lennie ironically and sadly kills Curleys married woman. Curleys wife goes to him, because she feels they both aim the same kind of loneliness. In killing Curleys wife, Lennie prevents himself, George and glaze from fulfilling their dreams of a simple easy life. The tragedy at the end is that Lennies dream will never be achieved. Lennie must be shot, as living in this society where theyd lock him up an strap him down, and perpetrate him in a cage would be worse. Lennie is prevented from satisfying his simple fantasy of when he and George will live off the fatta the lan, not only by his mind, nevertheless in the main by a society which has no place for a man with supernumerary conditions, who needs special care. candy is a lonely old man, representing those alone and cured in this fictional microcosm. His one companion in life is his cross. There is an division of sadness when referring to confects wienerwurst. The mark represents edulcorate in many ways. He was the best damn sheep dog I ever seen, exclusively now he is old and disabled, much like glass. His dog is useless, but confect wants to carry on his dog because he is used to him. There are undertones that hint that part of the reason Candy wants to keep his dog is because he knows it symbolises him and his line of credit into uselessness. In the end Candys dog is shot, implying the tragic fate of Candy. Candy lives in regret from allowing Carlson to shoot his dog. I shouldnt ought to of let no alien shoot my dog. He feels he should have put the dog out of its affliction himself, but did nothing to prevent Carlson from this. Candys hand was lost during an cerebrovascular accident at the ranch, which is wherefore he hitherto has a job at the ranch.The chiefs sympathy keeps him at that place, long later on he is of use to the ranch. even out with this reassurance, Candy deeply fears theyll can me purty soon. He knows at that place is nothing to offer a bungling old man in the solid ground he exists in. When they can me here I wisht somebodyd shoot me. He escapes from this daunting future by imagining an alternate one, one that would stupefy meaning to his life, and lessen the fear which he feels about the future. He is drawn in by a dream of position an end to this insignificant life he pass aways, and living as his own boss. He offers to pay most of the money for the house which George and Lennie dream about. This hope is all that Candy has to live for, and the end shows George dismiss this head there is small-scale hope for Candys fantasy, or anyone elses in this tough society.Curleys wife shows us how tragic this society is for wo men in these times. No one on the ranch has sympathy for her. Even we as readers have little until we hear her confide in Lennie at the end. Society in the novel is shown to be very male chauvinist. Women like Curleys wife were expected to lead very national lives, living essentially to serve their hubby and children. She is the only woman on the ranch, who is exceedingly purty and she has got the eye. The ranch workers misinterpret her forwardness for flirting, but she is just lonely. Curleys wife tries to use her beauty to her advantage even so, the men exclude her, calling little to her- thinking her an unfaithful tart. George describes her as one of these here jail baits. Steinbeck presents Curleys wife as a sex symbol. She dresses as if sterilize to go out, with rouged lips, wearing red shoes, and red fingernails, symbolising sex, seductiveness and danger. But still, only Lennie is tempted by her attractiveness.We sympathise with her commitment to Curley and as she confides in Lennie, we realise her unhappiness with the unfulfilling marriage. Curley, a childish and violent woman iser treats his wife as a possession to show off to his friends. He did not draw her out of love- but out of circumstances. Curleys wife is not even presumptuousness a name by Stienbeck, which underlines her humility and low rank in the sexist mans world shown in this story. Curleys wife is very lonely, which echoes Crooks life. She understands Lennie, in the way that he is not authentic into society, and this is why she opens up to him, obviously if she has to speak to someone as stupid as Lennie, this shows how little deference she has from other workers. She reveals more to Lennie, than anyone else in the story talk of her past.Curleys wife unfeignedly believes she could have become an actress, and if she had she wouldnt be livin like this, you bet. She blames her failed playacting career on her ol lady. Curleys wife claims that actors have said she could be good. Unfortunately, these men have probably only been attracted to her by her beauty, and not by any real talent s he had. Her beauty makes her open to these sorts of people, and she doesnt understand that these offers are almost sure enough not genuine. She wants to spend time speaking to Lennie, Candy and Crooks because she feels higher than them. completely her life she has been told what to do and abused, and she rebels against this by trying to escape from this boring life, by marrying Curley.Crooks, the Negro lasting buck is a man who suffers greatly from the American society in which original racism is a way of life. Blacks did not get the vote, and white-black dealings were heavily frowned upon. He represents the situation of blacks throughout America, being excluded in the society presented to us. The reader reads on with interest and sympathy, for the unreasonable and heartless way that Crooks is treated. Crooks lives in his gimcrack in the harness room. He lives away from the other workers in his one room containing the bare necessities. He has no friends in or out of the ranch a nd his existence reckons to be pointless. Crooks name comes from his crooked back, which puts him in bulky pain. This symbolises the pain he suffers throughout his unit life. Crooks tells a tragic story of how he used to play with white kids, but as soon as the children grew up, they passing-developed the racism that ran through their society.The hard ratty life which Crooks has lived has led him to be a very bitter old man. His distrustful yet realistic view on life is clear, If I say something, why its just a ringtail saying it. Crooks knows his meaningless place in society, but still he has his feel his room was swept and fairly neat, for Crooks was a proud aloof man. This allows us to respect the self-importance Crooks still has after the appalling and unjust life he has led. His character though is not presented as a character that is easy to sympathise with. In an interesting way, Stienbeck presents his ungrateful, sarcastic manner of referring to his bunk house, With a manure pile away(p) the window.He shows the angry way that he talks to Curleys wife, I had enough, he said coldly you got no rights comin in a coloured mans room. Steinbeck shows Crooks as a miserable old man, whose harsh character doesnt seem easy to sympathise with. Steinbeck in feature tried to create sympathy for the blacks in America by showing Crooks as an intelligent man who has been hardened by a cruel and affectionately antiblack society in which he lives. flock in the ranch exclude him, as there is no correct or wanted place for Crooks in the ranch, or the entire social order.John Steinbeck had experient this flawed society setoff hand, natural and bred in America, and living there for xxxv years before writing this book. He had also worked as a farm labourer before writing the novel. Steinbeck sympathised with the underdog, and truly appreciated and admired the working class. The social order was extremely immoral. It was sexist, and highly racist, which the nov el alerts the reader to. Steinbecks other known novel, The Grapes of Wrath was also a policy-making protest, and it is vital to remember this story is written to influence the reader. The reader should bear in mind that the novel is not just a story of an unusual friendship that ends tragically it is a critical story, with strong undertones, written to alarm and influence the reader.All characters seem to be entrapped by society, but can we hold it entirely answerable? Is perhaps Steinbeck trying to ask how much of the characters unhappiness is down to mankind character? Lennie, although very much misunderstood by society would not have fitted in anywhere. His condition limits him significantly. Even in a hospice, or with 24hour care, it would be impossible for him to lead a regular life. What future is there for a lonely old man with no hand even in todays society? Even the benefits that he would receive today would not help Candy live the life he wants to live. Even Curleys w ifes sad life of being used, and lied to, cannot be blamed on society. How is it possible to guarantee everyone success and riches? The emptiness of her dreams is no fault of society. George also was by no way prevented from acquire the farmhouse after Lennies death, but when Candy asks will we still go, he says I think I knowed from the very first wed never do her.This is due to his lack of self-will. I feel that Steinbeck does not only criticise society, but human nature. Human nature is very much responsible for characters not having the will to agree out their hopes, dreams and desires. The characters do not keep pushing to achieve. George accepts that he will continue in this unimportant subsistence, Ill work my month an Ill take my cubic decimetre bucks. Curleys wife accepts that she Coulda been in the movies. I feel Steinbeck tries to show how many people settle for less, because it is easier.It is always easier to use a scapegoat, and in this story, society can be seen a s this. Doesnt every society have its faults anyway? The society shown is very different from todays, and has many faults, it is unfair, highly racist, and designed for the perfect person. This novel focuses on the misfits of society, and although the social order is far from perfect, it is not the only factor. This Novella is a reproof of not only society, but also human nature. Steinbeck shows characters hampered from all walks of life. The reader reads with interest this disturbing and realistic window into a deeply flawed society.